大棚内农民饲养蜜蜂授粉，男子抽根烟死掉大半，为何蜜蜂怕香烟？

I think this is a good step forward. While I still think we need to actively revisit the close reason set and wording, making questions get actioned faster helps everyone.

A primary source of contention between members of the community is a result of the friction caused by the closure process.

Would you rather come back to your post and see a bunch of canned comments, some upvoted multiple times, or would you rather the system guide you through issues with your post, and notes that it's not going to get visibility beyond being linked on your profile until you make at least one edit (with links to help)? The latter is definitely preferable, and offers far less opportunity for folks to speak out of frustration. - Tim Post ?

5 votes can take quite some time, and as a result the time frame became troubling because users tapping their feet waiting for closure often left canned comments which the askers then lashed out at.

Hopefully this change reduces that friction point, any progress there will improve community health.

I think this is a good step forward. While I still think we need to actively revisit the close reason set and wording, making questions get actioned faster helps everyone.

A primary source of contention between members of the community is a result of the friction caused by the closure process.

Would you rather come back to your post and see a bunch of canned comments, some upvoted multiple times, or would you rather the system guide you through issues with your post, and notes that it's not going to get visibility beyond being linked on your profile until you make at least one edit (with links to help)? The latter is definitely preferable, and offers far less opportunity for folks to speak out of frustration. - Tim Post ?

5 votes can take quite some time, and as a result the time frame became troubling because users tapping their feet waiting for closure often left canned comments which the askers then lashed out at.

Hopefully this change reduces that friction point, any progress there will improve community health.

I think this is a good step forward. While I still think we need to actively revisit the close reason set and wording, making questions get actioned faster helps everyone.

A primary source of contention between members of the community is a result of the friction caused by the closure process.  5 votes can take quite some time, and as a result the time frame became troubling because users tapping their feet waiting for closure often left canned comments which the askers then lashed out at. Hopefully this change reduces that friction point, any progress there will improve community health.

I think this is a good step forward. While I still think we need to actively revisit the close reason set and wording, making questions get actioned faster helps everyone.

A primary source of contention between members of the community is a result of the friction caused by the closure process.

Would you rather come back to your post and see a bunch of canned comments, some upvoted multiple times, or would you rather the system guide you through issues with your post, and notes that it's not going to get visibility beyond being linked on your profile until you make at least one edit (with links to help)? The latter is definitely preferable, and offers far less opportunity for folks to speak out of frustration. - Tim Post ?

5 votes can take quite some time, and as a result the time frame became troubling because users tapping their feet waiting for closure often left canned comments which the askers then lashed out at. 

Hopefully this change reduces that friction point, any progress there will improve community health.

I think this is a good step forward. While I still think we need to actively revisit the close reason set and wording, making questions get actioned faster helps everyone.

A primary source of contention between members of the community is a result of the friction caused by the closure process. 5 votes can take quite some time, and as a result the time frame became troubling because users tapping their feet waiting for closure often left canned comments which the askers then lashed out at. Hopefully this change reduces that friction point, any progress there will improve community health.

I think this is a good step forward. While I still think we need to actively revisit the close reason set and wording, making questions get actioned faster helps everyone.

A primary source of contention between members of the community is a result of the friction caused by the closure process. 5 votes can take quite some time, and as a result the time frame became troubling because users tapping their feet waiting for closure often left canned comments which the askers then lashed out at. Hopefully this change reduces that friction point, any progress there will improve community health.