酷家乐新获1亿美金融资 家居行业生态迎新变局
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31 at 13:38 | comment | added | Joel Coehoorn | There are good points here, but I'm actually not too worried about this. This is easy to roll back if comment spam does become a problem. | |
| Jul 30 at 23:37 | comment | added | einpoklum | "I understand the desire to "try it and see what the statistics show"" <- You shouldn't, because they're not experimenting on themselves, they're experimenting on us. (Well, mostly on users who do more moderation work than me personally, but still.) | |
| Jul 29 at 18:02 | history | edited | Dan Getz | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 97 characters in body
|
| Jul 29 at 16:45 | comment | added | VLAZ | *Also, I fear detecting problematic comments will be problematic in itself. We have no good overview of when comments are posted and where. With posts, you can at least see them in the last active and notice if a new answer shows up. Or if something is modified. With comments - we have no way to examine them. Other than through the API. The tool improvements I see announced are mostly to deal with something that was detected, not with detecting stuff. | |
| Jul 29 at 16:45 | comment | added | VLAZ | "Actions by the biggest spammers will ruin the statistics, unless you separate them out." I think the bigger problem is what happened with Discussions. There were little spammers at first but months later the floodgates opened and there was incessant spam. If history repeats itself, then during the experiment we might not see much spam in comments*. But after it graduates, it might start. | |
| Jul 29 at 16:34 | history | answered | Dan Getz | CC BY-SA 4.0 |